How can there be so many differences between schools of Buddhism? How can we tell which one is the most accurate to avoid having a wrong view?

From the 2011 issue of the JIABS.

I understand that the Sarvastivadins had an atomistic view of time and that matter moments and mind moments were held to be equivalent.

The handouts for lesson 5 provide the following simile:

The Sarvastiva state that every instance of consciousness must necessarily have an object so that to have the snake, one must have the rope, even thought it is incorrectly cognized.

In the notes for Lesson 1 are provided five arguments from the MVS for the tri-temporal existence of dharmas (see pages 9-10).

The last states:

In the notes for Lesson 10 (page 4), the opinions of the three different Vinaya schools are given with regard to Jieti.

If you're looking for Sarvāstivāda Abhidharma (5th ed., hardcover) by Venerable Professor K L Dhammajoti, it is available for order at the price of HKD200. With shipping to Texas it's about $44.

Hello everybody,

I like to share with the Abhidhamma papers:

http://www.bahaistudies.net/asma/samatha5.pdf

With metta,

Hoang

Dear All,

Share with you: Vasumitra's Samayabhedoparacanacakra.